ETD: 774 Why risk it?; Red Hat Society for under 50; The Myth of the Secure Operating System

E-Tailer's Digest etd_post at gapent.com
Tue Apr 6 11:51:23 GMT 2004


  E-Tailer's Digest --- Everything for the  Retailer
  Issue #0774                    April 6, 2004
  George Matyjewicz, Moderator         mailto:georgem at gapent.com
  Published by:  GAP Enterprises, Ltd.  http://www.etailersdigest.com
==================================================================
   CONTENTS

  [1]  Greetings
  [2]  Why risk it?
  [3]  Red Hat Society for under 50
  [4]  The Myth of the Secure Operating System

==================================================================
  [1]  Greetings.
==================================================================
Hi All:

We have some interesting material today.  Microsoft is no longer the 
operating system that is being attacked by hackers.  Linux and even MAC are 
being attacked.  Now if somebody can only channel the creativeness of 
hackers into something good, we would probably see major advancements.

As reported earlier, gambling online will be allowed in the US, if they 
want to be part of the WTO.  You would think it would be a gold mine.  Yet 
many are avoiding the hassle, in spite of the potential financial 
rewards.  What do you think?

Finally, we have one more blurb on the Red Hats - the ladies, not the 
Operating System.  They have an under 50 following!

Tell us about your business which will remain  for posterity at 
our  "Members: Who Are You?" site. 
http://etailersdigest.com/resources/members/index.htm And we have a form 
there for you to tell us about you.  As I said when I first proposed this 
idea, we have "known" each other for a long time, yet we often don't know 
anything about each other.   So, tell us who you are and what you do.

Now, let's get to everything for the retailer.

Sincerely


George Matyjewicz, PhD
Chief Global Strategist, GAP Enterprises, Ltd.
mailto:georgem at gapent.com
http://www.etailersdigest.com

==================================================================
  [2]  Why risk it?
==================================================================
Aiming to avoid a possible showdown with law-enforcement officials,  Yahoo 
and Google, the two largest search engines -- and online-
advertising generators -- have said they will stop taking advertisements in 
the United States from gambling casinos and related companies. Both  search 
providers reached their decisions 
independently.  http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/33319.html

What I find interesting about this announcement is the fear companies have 
over potential threats.  Gambling is this year's porn issue.  Two countries 
have successfully petitioned the WTO to allow gambling online in the US, if 
the US is going to be part of the WTO.  Instead of it being a potential 
gold mine for advertisers, these two majors decided to take the safe road, 
and avoid potential conflict with the government.

Folks involved with offshore banking and digital currency have experienced 
the same issues.  The PATRIOT act is US-based only, yet many global 
organizations comply, rather than run the risk of scrutiny.  The same holds 
true with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - a US-based law that many global 
organizations are following.

Do folks fall in line so as not to rock the boat?  Are they afraid of the 
repercussions?  Reputational  risks?  Government risks?  Or is it simply a 
financial matter - why risk it?

What do you think?

George
==================================================================
  [3]  Red Hat Society for under 50
==================================================================
George wrote: ....We have more on the Red Hat Ladies.  That seems to be 
something to
capitalize on.  Why limit the Red Hats and purple dresses to ladies over 
50?  Why not have "Junior Red Hats" or "Kiddie Red Hats?"  Seems to me it 
could be a lucrative business venture.

There already is an affiliated promotion with the Red Hat Society clubs, 
George; any gal under age 50 who attends as a guest at their functions is 
to wear a pink hat and lavender dress!

Marty Oskvig
www.beautipage.com/here4u

+++ [Moderator's Comments] +++
Cool.  Now they should move it on down to the young 'uns.  What a 
franchise. Keep them in red and purple forever.

George

==================================================================
  [4]  The Myth of the Secure Operating System
==================================================================
The mi2g Intelligence Unit , a UK-based security consultancy, issued three 
bulletins recently. One suggested that direct attacks -- as opposed to 
worms or viruses -- on Linux-based servers were on the rise and had for the 
first time outstripped those directed at Microsoft platforms. Microsoft 
systems were still found to be the major targets of malware.

An equally interesting claim came next: After examining more than 17,000 
attacks in January and again in February, mi2g Intelligence Unit concluded 
that when it comes to direct attacks, "the world's safest and most secure 
online server operating system is proving to be the Open Source family of 
BSD (Berkley Software Distribution) and the Mac OS X based on Darwin."

Several questions suggest themselves immediately: Is it true, how do you 
know, and can any such judgment even be meaningful?
The third question must be answered before tackling the others, and Laura 
DiDio, senior analyst at the Yankee Group, suggested that the answer is no. 
"Overall," she said, "no operating system or piece of software is going to 
be inherently more secure than another."
for human interaction, such as opening an e-mail attachment.

"Forget about the OS," DiDio concluded. "Don't even argue those merits. 
Every piece of software that is connected is potentially vulnerable and at 
risk."

http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/33293.html

In an article in the Wall Street Journal, it was reported than Fortify 
Software Inc. unveiled a set of tools to help examine and test software 
code for security flaws while programs are being developed. The closely 
held company was funded by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and is based 
in the firm's offices in Menlo Park, Calif.

Computer experts last week urged the industry to make security a built-in 
feature of software. Silicon Valley's best-known venture-capital firm is 
backing a start-up to help programmers do just that.

The venture is a response to the rising number of computer attacks, which 
are overwhelming the defenses deployed by companies and government 
agencies. Such safeguards, including intrusion-detection devices and 
programs known as firewalls, are designed to keep intruders out of 
sensitive networks.
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB108120058925774650,00.html


==================================================================
  Links to follow
==================================================================
GAP Enterprises, Ltd.                           http://www.gapent.com/
Sarbanes-Oxley 2002                     http://www.sarbanes-oxley2002.com
E-Tailer's Digest                       http://www.etailersdigest.com
ETD Archives:                           http://topica.com/lists/etailer/read
Prior to 29 Dec 
1999                    http://etailersdigest.com/archives/index.htm
Marketing Your Web                      http://www.gapent.com/myweb/
Automated Press Releases                http://www.automatedpr.com 



More information about the ETD mailing list